🔗 Share this article

Thhese times showcase a very distinctive phenomenon: the pioneering US procession of the babysitters. Their qualifications differ in their skills and characteristics, but they all have the common mission – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even demolition, of Gaza’s fragile truce. After the hostilities finished, there have been scant days without at least one of Donald Trump’s representatives on the territory. Just in the last few days saw the arrival of a senior advisor, a businessman, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to perform their assignments.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few days it executed a wave of strikes in Gaza after the loss of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, according to reports, in many of local fatalities. A number of ministers demanded a restart of the war, and the Knesset approved a initial decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The American response was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in various respects, the Trump administration appears more concentrated on maintaining the existing, uneasy stage of the truce than on advancing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. Regarding that, it looks the United States may have goals but few concrete proposals.

At present, it is unknown when the suggested multinational administrative entity will actually assume control, and the similar applies to the appointed security force – or even the identity of its soldiers. On Tuesday, Vance declared the United States would not dictate the composition of the foreign unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's government persists to dismiss various proposals – as it acted with the Turkish proposal this week – what happens then? There is also the reverse issue: who will determine whether the troops supported by Israel are even interested in the assignment?

The issue of how long it will need to neutralize the militant group is equally vague. “Our hope in the administration is that the international security force is intends to now assume responsibility in neutralizing Hamas,” remarked Vance this week. “That’s going to take a period.” The former president further reinforced the lack of clarity, declaring in an conversation a few days ago that there is no “hard” timeline for the group to demilitarize. So, hypothetically, the unidentified members of this yet-to-be-formed international force could deploy to Gaza while the organization's militants still remain in control. Would they be dealing with a leadership or a militant faction? Among the many of the questions emerging. Others might question what the verdict will be for ordinary residents under current conditions, with the group carrying on to focus on its own adversaries and opposition.

Recent developments have yet again highlighted the blind spots of local media coverage on each side of the Gaza border. Every source strives to scrutinize each potential perspective of Hamas’s infractions of the peace. And, usually, the situation that Hamas has been delaying the repatriation of the remains of deceased Israeli hostages has monopolized the coverage.

Conversely, coverage of civilian deaths in the region caused by Israeli strikes has obtained little notice – if any. Consider the Israeli response actions following Sunday’s southern Gaza event, in which a pair of troops were lost. While local authorities stated dozens of fatalities, Israeli media analysts questioned the “light response,” which focused on only infrastructure.

This is nothing new. Over the recent few days, the information bureau accused Israeli forces of violating the truce with Hamas multiple times after the agreement began, causing the death of dozens of individuals and harming an additional 143. The allegation appeared insignificant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was merely absent. Even reports that eleven members of a Palestinian family were killed by Israeli forces last Friday.

The emergency services said the individuals had been attempting to go back to their residence in the Zeitoun area of the city when the transport they were in was attacked for reportedly going over the “boundary” that defines areas under Israeli army authority. This limit is not visible to the naked eye and shows up solely on charts and in authoritative documents – sometimes not obtainable to ordinary residents in the region.

Yet this incident barely got a note in Israeli journalism. Channel 13 News mentioned it in passing on its website, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who said that after a questionable transport was identified, troops shot cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport kept to advance on the troops in a fashion that caused an direct danger to them. The forces shot to remove the threat, in accordance with the ceasefire.” No fatalities were stated.

Amid this narrative, it is no surprise many Israeli citizens feel Hamas exclusively is to blame for breaking the ceasefire. That perception could lead to prompting demands for a tougher stance in the region.

Sooner or later – perhaps in the near future – it will no longer be sufficient for American representatives to act as supervisors, telling Israel what not to do. They will {have to|need